I'm Lisa Taylor, an integrated copywriter of all sorts of stuff. Except vanity license plates. I just don't get the appeal.
Please wait while my tweets load 
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
My appreciation for the visual side of communications goes back to the 3rd grade.
My spelling skills are another story.
Yesterday, a stranger flagged me down and said we were wearing the exact same “mom outfit.” But she was wrong.
Her Dansko clogs were blue.
Words With Fridges: fun and games with cooling appliances
Looking for some entertainment? To expand your vocabulary? Look no farther than your kitchen. To play Words With Fridges, you need two things:
2. A fridge
While there’s no wrong way to play Words With Fridges, I do recommend against using Magnetic Poetry. That’s so 90′s.
Ready? Let’s begin.
At first, having 26 characters without any doubles may feel limiting, but you will find there are plenty of words left in the dictionary to spell. You simply need to figure out a technique. To warm up, I recommend playing with context.
Then feel free to be as irreverent as you want.
Or cerebral.
The point is to have fun, after all.
Especially if you have young children in the house.
And maybe don’t talk to as many adults as you once did.
Anyway, to add another layer to Words With Fridges, simply add a LeapFrog Fridge Farm. This 2.0 version provides animal hybrid functionality.
Words With Fridges is not for everyone. But it’s quite easy to spot those who are unimpressed by the game.
Take it or leave it, you will find that Words With Fridges gets more fun and challenging over time, more so if you kick a vowel or two way under the fridge. You can even mix it up and play on your dishwasher. Or your dryer.
I’d spell “lost sock” here, but I couldn’t find a spare “o.”
Who doesn’t appreciate an email notification about getting less email notifications?
I suppose sending carrier pigeons to 750 million members would have been inefficient from a cost perspective. And messy.
